| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 441538 | Computers & Graphics | 2012 | 12 Pages |
Recently, mobile-phone based outdoor augmented reality (AR) systems have become readily available. One of the most popular applications are AR browsers that show virtual points of interest (POIs) overlaid on top of the phone's camera view. These virtual cues can be used to guide people to the POIs. However, the usefulness of AR systems for guiding users to POI has not yet been evaluated, especially when compared to map interfaces. In this paper we present results of a user study comparing navigation with information typically provided by currently available handheld AR browsers, to navigation with a digital map, and a combined map and AR condition. We found no overall difference in task completion time, but found evidence that AR browsers are less useful for navigation in some environment conditions. We also found that navigation performance differed significantly with gender for the Map and AR+Map interfaces, but is very similar across gender for the AR interface. Users preferred the combined AR+Map condition, and felt that there were significant problems with using the AR view alone for navigation.
Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload high-quality image (475 K)Download as PowerPoint slideHighlights► We have conducted one of the first user studies investigating how users navigate with mobile AR browsers. ► We present results comparing navigation performance while using handheld AR browsers to using a digital map. ► We present results on gender differences with these interfaces. ► We highlight lessons learned, common issues and limitation with using mobile AR browsers for providing navigation information.
