Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
457518 Journal of Network and Computer Applications 2011 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

The performance of today's email anti-spam systems is primarily measured by the percentage of false positives (non-spam messages detected as spam) rather than by the percentage of false negatives (real spam messages left unblocked). One reliable anti-spam technique is the Universal Resource Locator (URL)-based filter, which is utilized by most collaborative signature-based filters. URL-based filters examine URL frequency in incoming email and block bulk email when a predetermined threshold is passed. However, this can cause erroneous blocking of mass distribution of legitimate emails. Therefore, URL-based methods are limited in sufficient prevention of false positives, and finding solutions to eliminate this problem is critical for anti-spam systems. We present a complementary technique for URL-based filters, which uses the betweenness of web-page hostnames to prevent the erroneous blocking of legitimate hosts. The technique described was tested on a corpus of 10,000 random domains selected from the URIBL white and black list databases. We generated the appropriate linked network for each domain and calculated its centrality betweenness. We found that betweenness centrality of whitelist domains is significantly higher than that of blacklist domains. Results clearly show that the betweenness centrality metric can be a powerful and effective complementary tool for URL-based anti-spam systems. It can achieve a high level of accuracy in determining legitimate hostnames and thus significantly reduce false positives in these systems.

► URL-based anti-spam filters are limited in sufficient prevention of false positives. ► Our system calculates betweenness centrality of domains in a generated network. ► This system achieved a high level of accuracy in determining legitimate hostnames. ► Thus it can markedly reduce the percentage of false positives in URL-based systems.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Computer Science Computer Networks and Communications
Authors
, ,