Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
467920 Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2012 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

Karyotype analysis is a widespread procedure in cytogenetics to assess the presence of genetic defects by the visualization of the structure of chromosomes. The procedure is lengthy and repetitive and an effective automatic analysis would greatly help the cytogeneticist routine work. Still, automatic segmentation and the full disentangling of chromosomes are open issues. The first step in every automatic procedure is the thresholding step, which detect blobs that represent either single chromosomes or clusters of chromosomes. The better the thresholding step, the easier is the subsequent disentanglement of chromosome clusters into single entities.We implemented eleven thresholding methods, i.e. the ones that appear in the literature as the best performers, and compared their performance in segmenting chromosomes and chromosome clusters in cytogenetic Q-band images. The images are affected by the presence of hyper- or hypo-fluorescent regions and by a contrast variability between the stained chromosomes and the background. A thorough analysis of the results highlights that, although every single algorithm shows peculiar strong/weak points, Adaptive Threshold and Region Based Level Set have the overall best performance. In order to provide the scientific community with a public dataset, the data and manual segmentation used in this paper are available for public download at http://bioimlab.dei.unipd.it

► Automatic segmentation and disentangling of cytogenetic images are open issues.► Images are affected by the presence of hyper- and hypo-fluorescent regions and by contrast variability.► Thresholding is often the first, crucial step in cytogenetic image analysis.► We compare eleven thresholding methods in segmenting chromosomes and chromosome clusters.► Adaptive Threshold and Region Based Level Set show the best performance overall.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Computer Science Computer Science (General)
Authors
, , , ,