| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 474113 | Computers & Mathematics with Applications | 2009 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
This paper shows, by examples, that Lemma 2.1, Lemma 3.1, Corollary 3.1, Corollary 3.2, Theorem 3.1, Corollary 3.3, Theorem 3.3 and Lemma 4.1 in [Y. Luo, Resolution of fuzzy relation equation (I) based on Boolean-type implications, Comput. Math. Appl. 52 (2006) 421–428] about resolution of fuzzy relation equations based on Boolean-type implications, are false. We also point out that the solution set of Example 5.1 is not right and we give the right solution set of Example 5.1.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Computer Science (General)
Authors
Jinquan Li, Kaibiao Sun, Hongxing Li,