Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4916261 | Applied Energy | 2017 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
We report that in the Bio scenario, the cost-optimal system is dominated by wind power and flexible bio-based generation, whereas base-load generation dominates the Base load scenario, in line with the assumptions made, and the level of wind power is reduced. In the Base load scenario, 19% of the capacity is cycling-dependent, i.e., for this share of installed capacity, the choice of technology is different if cycling properties are included, compared to a case in which they are omitted. In the Bio scenario, in which flexible bio-based generation is less costly, 9% of the capacity is cycling-dependent. We conclude that it is critical to include cycling properties in investment modeling, to assess investments in thermal generation technologies that compete at utilization times in the range of 2000-5000Â h.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Authors
Lisa Göransson, Joel Goop, Mikael Odenberger, Filip Johnsson,