Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4916625 Applied Energy 2016 20 Pages PDF
Abstract
The adopted methodological approach combines the use of dynamic energy simulation tool (EnergyPlus), based on a one-dimensional conduction finite difference solution method, and a constrained multi-objective optimization algorithm. For four cities (Madrid, Nice, Naples, Athens), several passive strategies are compared: thermal properties of the building envelope, adoption of phase change materials with different melting temperatures, cool roof solutions, several window/wall ratio values, some external and internal shading systems. The results allow to evidence that it is difficult to understand the best trade-off between summer and winter performance, by assuring high standard of thermal comfort when the aim is to reach NZEB objectives in Mediterranean climate. However, some guidelines are indicated, starting from the discussed results.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Energy Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Authors
, , , , , , ,