Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4939289 | The Journal of Mathematical Behavior | 2017 | 16 Pages |
Abstract
This study is an investigation of students' reasoning about integer comparisons-a topic that is often counterintuitive for students because negative numbers of smaller absolute value are considered greater (e.g., â5 > â 6). We posed integer-comparison tasks to 40 students each in Grades 2, 4, and 7, as well as to 11th graders on a successful mathematics track. We coded for correctness and for students' justifications, which we categorized in terms of 3 ways of reasoning: magnitude-based, order-based, and developmental/other. The 7th graders used order-based reasoning more often than did the younger students, and it more often led to correct answers; however, the college-track 11th graders, who responded correctly to almost every problem, used a more balanced distribution of order- and magnitude-based reasoning. We present a framework for students' ways of reasoning about integer comparisons, report performance trends, rank integer-comparison tasks by relative difficulty, and discuss implications for integer instruction.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Applied Mathematics
Authors
Ian Whitacre, Beti Azuz, Lisa L.C. Lamb, Jessica Pierson Bishop, Bonnie P. Schappelle, Randolph A. Philipp,