Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4940159 | Learning and Individual Differences | 2017 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
The present research tests predictions of Dimensional Comparison Theory (DCT) with respect to the fundamental dimensions of social judgment, agency (A) and communion (C). A and C represent fundamental challenges every person is confronted with: getting ahead and getting along. It is examined if dimensional comparisons take place in self-evaluations of A and C. Dimensional comparisons are carried out between one's own characteristics in two domains and influence on domain-specific self-concepts, in the way that positive feedback in one domain negatively affects self-concept in the other domain. Study 1 (NÂ =Â 493 students) regressed in a path-analytic design students' self-ascriptions of A and C on peer- and teacher-evaluations of students' A and C. Study 2a (NÂ =Â 92 university students) and 2b (NÂ =Â 91 university students) experimentally studied the effect of feedback on A and C on self-evaluation in the non-corresponding domain. Findings from both studies speak for the existence of contrastive dimensional comparisons between the two domains.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Psychology
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Authors
Friederike Helm, Andrea E. Abele, Hanno Müller-Kalthoff, Jens Möller,