Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5034735 Journal of Economic Psychology 2017 13 Pages PDF
Abstract

•We compare 2 mechanisms for team effort provision and how teams choose between them.•In one mechanism team output is shared equally among team members.•In the other mechanism team output is distributed by a team leader.•We find that output is higher when a leader has distributive power.•However teams tend to resist the allocation of distributive power to the leader.

We study, experimentally, how two alternative incentive mechanisms affect team performance and how a team chooses between alternative mechanisms. We study a group incentive mechanism (team output is shared equally among team members) and a hierarchical mechanism (team output is allocated by a team leader). We find that output is higher when a leader has the power to allocate output, but this mechanism also generates large differences between earnings of leaders and other team members. When team members can choose how much of team output is to be shared equally and how much is to be allocated by a leader they tend to restrict the leader's power to distributing less than half of the pie.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Business, Management and Accounting Marketing
Authors
, , ,