Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5076536 | Insurance: Mathematics and Economics | 2015 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
This paper first defines an increase in ambiguity and an increase in downside ambiguity. We then provide comparative criteria for ambiguity aversion and downside ambiguity aversion. Different from the finding that the comparative criterion for risk aversion is variant with the measure of the premium to reduce risks, we show that the criteria remain the same, whether the premiums to reduce ambiguity and downside ambiguity are measured by utility or money. Under the criteria, a more ambiguity-averse (downside-ambiguity-averse)Â individual is shown to spend more effort in reducing ambiguity (downside ambiguity) than a less ambiguity-averse (downside-ambiguity-averse)Â individual.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Statistics and Probability
Authors
Yi-Chieh Huang, Larry Y. Tzeng, Lin Zhao,