Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5086741 | Journal of Accounting and Economics | 2013 | 25 Pages |
Abstract
We investigate the effect of standard setters in standard setting. We examine how certain professional and political characteristics of FASB members and SEC commissioners predict the accounting “reliability” and “relevance” of proposed standards. Notably, we find FASB members with backgrounds in financial services are more likely to propose standards that decrease “reliability” and increase “relevance,” partly due to their tendency to propose fair-value methods. We find opposite results for FASB members affiliated with the Democratic Party, although only when excluding financial-services background as an independent variable. Jackknife procedures show that results are robust to omitting any individual standard setter.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Accounting
Authors
Abigail Allen, Karthik Ramanna,