Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5086948 | Journal of Accounting and Economics | 2010 | 20 Pages |
Abstract
This paper analyzes audit firm supervision since the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) began conducting inspections. First, we find that audit clients do not perceive that the PCAOB's inspection reports are valuable for signaling audit quality. Second, we document that the information content of peer review reports fell after they became narrower in scope with the initiation of PCAOB inspections. Third, we isolate that the signaling role of peer review reports mainly stems from information that PCAOB inspectors do not publicly disclose. Collectively, our evidence implies that less is known about audit firm quality under the new regulatory regime.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Accounting
Authors
Clive Lennox, Jeffrey Pittman,