Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5092865 Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 2014 19 Pages PDF
Abstract
Over 31 finance companies (non-bank deposit takers) failed in New Zealand over the 2006-2009 period. With an estimated loss of over NZ$3 billion, there was public outcry and a parliamentary inquiry into the causes of the failures, but few have asked if this was a predictable event. We find that failed finance companies have lower capital adequacy, inferior asset quality, more loans falling due, higher earnings and lower cash flows. Furthermore, failed companies have a longer audit lag and some trustees appear to have a greater percentage of failed firms than others. Our logistic model can successfully classify failure one year before for 88.7% of companies. Our logistic model (neural network) can also correctly classify up to 87.5% (83.3%) of a holdout sample. Our results are of interest to regulators and practitioners, as we show that publicly available data could distinguish between failed and non-failed finance companies.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Business, Management and Accounting Business, Management and Accounting (General)
Authors
, , ,