Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5096039 Journal of Econometrics 2015 14 Pages PDF
Abstract
Simulations show that the Mallows model averaging and leave-h-out cross-validation averaging methods yield lower mean squared forecast errors than alternative model selection and averaging methods such as AIC, BIC, cross validation, and Bayesian model averaging. We apply the proposed methods to the US macroeconomic data set in Stock and Watson (2012) and find that they compare favorably to many popular shrinkage-type forecasting methods.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Mathematics Statistics and Probability
Authors
, ,