| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5105967 | Energy Policy | 2017 | 9 Pages | 
Abstract
												An evaluation of these measures has relevant implications for an appropriate auctions design for RES. The non-realization option induces lower bids. A suitable combination of financial and physical prequalifications can reduce the non-realization risk significantly, however, involves sunk costs. Counterintuitively, first-price auction and second-price auction lead to different expected award prices and different realization probabilities. Penalties bear a high risk of inefficient auction outcomes. The appropriate parametrization and combination of the measures is challenging. Under consideration of all implications, we recommend high financial and adjusted physical prequalifications to achieve a sufficiently high realization rate while maintaining efficiency.
											Related Topics
												
													Physical Sciences and Engineering
													Energy
													Energy Engineering and Power Technology
												
											Authors
												Jan Kreiss, Karl-Martin Ehrhart, Marie-Christin Haufe, 
											