Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5109849 | Journal of Business Research | 2016 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
This study examines the impact of self-disclosing incriminating information in the context of organizational crises. Study one indicates that when an organization self-discloses a crisis, participants devote less attention to subsequent negative publicity and any attention this information receives has less impact on the organizational post-crisis reputation. An interaction between crisis timing strategy and crisis involvement in study two suggests that if an organization self-discloses a crisis, both participants' attention to negative publicity and the impact of this attention on post-crisis reputation are low, irrespective of crisis involvement. If an organization does not self-disclose a crisis, however, crisis involvement affects consumers' attention to negative publicity but not the impact of this attention on the organizational post-crisis reputation. These findings offer an important indication that organizations in crisis should self-disclose potentially incriminating information.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Business and International Management
Authors
An-Sofie Claeys, Verolien Cauberghe, Mario Pandelaere,