CFD simulations of premixed hydrogen combustion using the Eddy Dissipation and the Turbulent Flame Closure models

Both default models predict combustion evolution reasonably well in all tests studied. For the ENACCEF dual compartment experiments, the flame propagation features several dynamical phases, and the TFC model using the progress variable approach reproduces better than the EDM the flame velocity evolution, which leads to better estimation of the temporal gradient of pressure. The better performance of the TFC model comes however at the expense of a larger computational effort, i.e. larger meshes and smaller time steps. This observed trend in 2D geometries is likely to be enhanced in 3D settings.