Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
523363 Journal of Informetrics 2016 31 Pages PDF
Abstract

•We analyze the application forms and final reports of the first Italian National Scientific Qualification.•We use simple text metrics to study whether final reports provide useful feedback to the applicants.•We argue that the ASN only partially follow the recommended best practices for the correct use of bibliometric indicators for the evaluation of individuals.

The Italian National Scientific Qualification (ASN) was introduced as a prerequisite for applying for tenured associate or full professor positions at state-recognized universities. The ASN is meant to attest that an individual has reached a suitable level of scientific maturity to apply for professorship positions. A five member panel, appointed for each scientific discipline, is in charge of evaluating applicants by means of quantitative indicators of impact and productivity, and through an assessment of their research profile. Many concerns were raised on the appropriateness of the evaluation criteria, and in particular on the use of bibliometrics for the evaluation of individual researchers. Additional concerns were related to the perceived poor quality of the final evaluation reports. In this paper we assess the ASN in terms of appropriateness of the applied methodology, and the quality of the feedback provided to the applicants. We argue that the ASN is not fully compliant with the best practices for the use of bibliometric indicators for the evaluation of individual researchers; moreover, the quality of final reports varies considerably across the panels, suggesting that measures should be put in place to prevent sloppy practices in future ASN rounds.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Computer Science Computer Science Applications
Authors
,