| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5509996 | Clinical Biochemistry | 2017 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Both analyzers studied are acceptable for daily routine lab work, even though SediMAX is easier to use in laboratories thanks to its lower maintenance procedure. UX-2000 has shown to have better concordance with the gold standard method. However, it needs some improvements such as an image module in order to decrease manual microscopy review for urine samples.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Authors
Catalina Sánchez-Mora, Delia Acevedo, Maria Amelia Porres, Ana MarÃa Chaqués, Javier Zapardiel, Aurelia Gallego-Cabrera, Jose MarÃa López, Jose MarÃa Maesa,