Knowledge risks in organizational networks: The practice perspective

This commentary paper aims to highlight issues associated with the supposed ability to transfer knowledge across networks. In response to the paper “Risks in Organizational Networks: An Exploratory Framework”, (Trkman and Desouza, 2012, pp. 1–17), we argue that the taken-for-granted assumption that knowledge is transferrable represents a risk in itself. We analyze knowledge in networks using a practice perspective – in turn we consider knowledge as enacted in social practices and as context-specific. In contrast with Trkman and Desouza’s paper, we argue that if knowledge is seen as enacted in practice, a framework that maps risks associated with knowledge transfer is limiting. We conclude that, since knowing in practice is emergent and not fully controllable, adopting a set of best practices on how to effectively transfer (or not) knowledge could itself be risky for managers who then believe that knowledge can be treated as a commodity and easily moved about a network.

► We treat issues associated with the supposed ability to transfer knowledge across networks. ► We take a practice perspective of knowledge. ► We argue that the taken-for-granted assumption that knowledge is transferrable is risky. ► We provide a classification of elements of practice theorizing. ► We conclude that knowledge should not be treated as a commodity.