Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5566205 American Journal of Infection Control 2017 5 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Intensive care unit nurses noncompliant with hand hygiene 18% of time because of 4 barriers.•Barriers included carrying something, using phone, gloving, and pushing or pulling workstations.•Low (<29% hand hygiene compliance [HHC]), high (80%-89% HHC), and super gelers (90%-100% HHC) were identified.•Call for standardized definitions for hand hygiene surveillance.

BackgroundThe purpose of this article was to provide information identified during hand hygiene (HH) surveillance periods at 5 intensive care units (ICUs) (4 hospitals) in Texas.MethodsUsing room entry and room exit, overt observation periods were 8 consecutive hours for 3-5 days on 64 ICU nurses.ResultsA total of 3,620 HH opportunities were recorded during 18 days of observation (144 hours). The average hand hygiene compliance (HHC) rate was 64%, with 19% of the nurses participating in HH in the 60%-69% range. Male nurses had a rate of 67%, whereas female nurses had a rate of 62%. Having a HHC rate of <29%, 6% of the nurses were identified as low gelers, whereas 14% were identified as high gelers (HHC rate 80%-89%), and 13% were classified as super gelers (HHC rate 90%-100%). Four barriers to HHC were identified: carrying something in their hands, talking on mobile phones, donning gloves or personal protective equipment, and pushing or pulling the workstation on wheels; all were statistically significant. Accounting for 18% noncompliance, barriers identified present teaching opportunities to increase compliance.ConclusionsAverage HHC rates recorded during 10- to 20-minute periods with random sampling may not show the complete picture of HHC. Barriers to HHC were identified that can be used as teaching interventions.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Immunology and Microbiology Microbiology