Accuracy of Vigileo/Flotrac monitoring system in morbidly obese patients

PurposeOur goal was to assess the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) by the FloTrac/Vigileo (COV) device in comparison with thermodilution technique through pulmonary artery catheterization (PACTD) in morbidly obese patients.Material and methodsCardiac output in 8 morbidly obese patients was assessed twice at upright and lying position breathing ambient air. At least 4 consecutive CO measurements with 10 mL of ice-cold saline injections were performed each time. Simultaneous CO measurements were recorded with both single-bolus thermodilution and COV.ResultsOne hundred thirty-two CO data pairs were collected. The overall mean single-bolus thermodilution 6.2 ± 1.1 L/min was lower than the overall mean COV 7.8 ± 1.6 L/min (P < .001). Lin concordance coefficient indicated that overall agreement between PACTD and COV was poor, 0.29. Lin concordance coefficient in sitting position was 0.29, 95% confidence interval (0.17-0.40) and in lying position was 0.30, 95% confidence interval (0.15-0.44). The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed systematically higher values from COV in comparison with PACTD. These differences increased in presence of high CO measurements. In 3 of 8 patients, the percentage error was lower than 20%, whereas in the other 5, it was higher than 20%. Of these 5, in 2 cases, the percentage error was greater than 50%.ConclusionData obtained using COV vs PACTD measurements showed poor correlation. The results were not interchangeable.