Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6082644 | Injury | 2016 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
These findings result in the following clinical “lessons learned”: 1. GRF is a good reflection of loading-induced deformation of the tibia. 2. GRFs are hard to control by subjects/patients. 3. The expectation that forefoot-loading results in larger tibia deformation could not be confirmed in our study. 4. When aiming at a reduction in tibia deformation, rear-foot loading is more preferable than forefoot loading.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Emergency Medicine
Authors
Bergita Ganse, Peng-Fei Yang, Jenny Gardlo, Peter Gauger, Andreas Kriechbaumer, Hans-Christoph Pape, Timmo Koy, Lars-Peter Müller, Jörn Rittweger,