| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6415819 | Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra | 2016 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
In this paper we affirmatively answer a question posed by F.-V. Kuhlmann. We show that the first Artin-Schreier defect extension in Cutkosky and Piltant's counter-example to strong monomialization is a dependent extension. Our main tool is the use of generating sequences of valuations.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Algebra and Number Theory
Authors
Samar ElHitti, Laura Ghezzi,