| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6484246 | Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering | 2017 | 7 Pages | 
Abstract
												When 2.5 and 3.0 mm ID ETTs were examined, laminar flow (Re <2300) across the tube was observed, and there were no clinically significant differences in the ventilation parameters between non-siliconised and siliconised tubes. Whereas, when 4 mm ID ETTs were tested, turbulent flow was observed, and PIP, Rins, Rexp and WOBvt were significantly lower (5%, 17%, 17%, and 7%, respectively) (P < 0.05), but PIF and PEF were significantly higher (8%, 14%) (P < 0.05). Thus, the silicone inner surface of ETT offers less resistance and WOBvt in presence of turbulent flow. However, artifacts observed on the surface of non-siliconised and siliconised ETTs can potentially impair ventilation.
											Keywords
												
											Related Topics
												
													Physical Sciences and Engineering
													Chemical Engineering
													Bioengineering
												
											Authors
												Barbara Stankiewicz, Marcin Rawicz, Marek Darowski, Krzysztof Zielinski, Maciej Kozarski, Andrzej Chwojnowski, 
											