Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6688178 | Applied Energy | 2015 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
The validated model was applied to a case study consisting of an internal office during the month of August in Beirut hot humid climate. A decrease of 10% in indoor relative humidity is observed when the system was used. The cost of the proposed system was compared to the cost of a conventional vapor compression cycle that provides the same indoor conditions. A payback period of 7Â years and 8Â month was estimated compared to the investment in the vapor compression cycle.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Authors
Khoudor Keniar, Kamel Ghali, Nesreen Ghaddar,