Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6688178 Applied Energy 2015 12 Pages PDF
Abstract
The validated model was applied to a case study consisting of an internal office during the month of August in Beirut hot humid climate. A decrease of 10% in indoor relative humidity is observed when the system was used. The cost of the proposed system was compared to the cost of a conventional vapor compression cycle that provides the same indoor conditions. A payback period of 7 years and 8 month was estimated compared to the investment in the vapor compression cycle.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Energy Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Authors
, , ,