Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6727959 | Energy and Buildings | 2018 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The two methods showed close agreement in terms of results, suggesting that the quicker test has great potential as a more practical and economic test. There were higher levels of uncertainty with the QUB method due to shorter measurement periods. The lack of full boundary conditions within the test facility should be considered a limitation in applying the findings directly to the field. However, this study indicates the potential for QUB in validating performance, warranting further investigation.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Authors
Florent Alzetto, David Farmer, Richard Fitton, Tara Hughes, Will Swan,