Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6802350 | Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment | 2016 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
In a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 6-month follow-up, 27 trained Dutch prevention workers recruited 71 Moti-4 participants and 60 controls assigned to usual care. Participants were Dutch youth aged 14-24 years who had used cannabis during the preceding month. At baseline (T0), post-test (T1) and 6-month follow-up (T2), participants completed a questionnaire with 51 items. The 27 prevention workers also completed a checklist to assess the fidelity of delivering each item to each participant in the Moti-4 protocol. Multilevel and binary logistic regression was used to assess the impact of the prevention worker and 14 participant variables on the likelihood of drop-out. Mean scores for cannabis use outcome measures by Moti-4 participants and controls at baseline, T1 and T2 were compared using paired sample t-tests. Top-down multiple regression was used to assess relationships between Moti-4 and 13 other variables on the one hand and changes in weekly cannabis use at T1 and T2 on the other. The Moti-4 experimental condition had a significant and positive influence in reducing the level of expenditure on cannabis (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in outcome, neither for the 4 participating institutes nor for the professionals implementing the intervention. Baseline cannabis use was the strongest predictor (p < 0.001) of weekly cannabis expenditure at posttest and 6-month follow-up. This effect was still present at T2. Being female, having two Dutch parents and perceived behavioral control also made significant positive contributions (p < 0.05). Attitude at baseline was only related to cannabis expenditure after 6 months (p = 0.005). At T2 Moti-4 participants were found to have a significant reduction in the number of joints smoked weekly compared to T0 (on the average 4 joints). The study demonstrated that Moti-4 is an effective intervention to reduce cannabis use in youth.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Biological Psychiatry
Authors
Hans B. Ph.D., Math J.J.M. Ph.D., Charles D. Ph.D., Dike Ph.D., Nanne K. Ph.D.,