Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6843271 | The Journal of Mathematical Behavior | 2018 | 15 Pages |
Abstract
This article reframes previously identified misconceptions about repeating decimals by describing these misconceptions as limited understandings of how mathematics concepts are referenced. In particular, misconceptions about repeating decimals and their quotient of integer representations are recast as limited understandings of mathematics as a discipline that derives its content from representational systems and the denotations they provided. Under this framework, arguments (e.g., proofs) that convert repeating decimals to their quotient of integer representations provide content for “rational number,” which is represented in multiple ways, each offering distinct opportunities for mathematical activity. The notion of an argument as content is illustrated as arguments providing access to a concept. One Grade 8 student's struggle with understanding rational number is used to illustrate this framework and its implications for teaching and learning.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Applied Mathematics
Authors
David A. Yopp,