Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6845541 | Learning and Instruction | 2018 | 14 Pages |
Abstract
Two studies were conducted to extend the Theory of Integrated Domains in Epistemology framework (TIDE; Muis, Bendixen, & Haerle, 2006) with regard to the level of topic-specificity and to empirically test crucial aspects of this extension. In Study 1, 212 student teachers were surveyed on their general and topic-specific absolute beliefs regarding eleven topics. Topic familiarity and students' teaching subjects were investigated as person-specific context factors. In Study 2, domain-specific and topic-specific multiplistic beliefs of 365 student teachers were investigated. The topic-specific context was experimentally manipulated; Students were presented with four texts on educational research whose content (invariant over the conditions) allegedly originated from a layperson, an expert, or a scientist. The results provide evidence for the assumption of a reciprocal influence between topic-specific and more general epistemic beliefs. Furthermore, we found substantial effects of topic-related contextual factors on topic-specific epistemic beliefs. Implications for theory and suggestions for future empirical research are discussed.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Psychology
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Authors
Samuel Merk, Tom Rosman, Krista R. Muis, Augustin Kelava, Thorsten Bohl,