Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6874174 | Information Processing Letters | 2018 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
In process mining, precision measures are used to quantify how much a process model overapproximates the behavior seen in an event log. Although several measures have been proposed throughout the years, no research has been done to validate whether these measures achieve the intended aim of quantifying over-approximation in a consistent way for all models and logs. This paper fills this gap by postulating a number of axioms for quantifying precision consistently for any log and any model. Further, we show through counter-examples that none of the existing measures consistently quantifies precision.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Computational Theory and Mathematics
Authors
Niek Tax, Xixi Lu, Natalia Sidorova, Dirk Fahland, Wil M.P. van der Aalst,