Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6884154 | Computers & Security | 2016 | 49 Pages |
Abstract
Simulated security assessments (a collective term used here for penetration testing, vulnerability assessment, and related nomenclature) may need standardisation, but not in the commonly assumed manner of practical assessment methodologies. Instead, this study highlights market failures within the providing industry at the beginning and ending of engagements, which has left clients receiving ambiguous and inconsistent services. It is here, at the prior and subsequent phases of practical assessments, that standardisation may serve the continuing professionalisation of the industry, and provide benefits not only to clients but also to the practitioners involved in the provision of these services. These findings are based on the results of 54 stakeholder interviews with providers of services, clients, and coordinating bodies within the industry. The paper culminates with a framework for future advancement of the ecosystem, which includes three recommendations for standardisation.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Computer Networks and Communications
Authors
William Knowles, Alistair Baron, Tim McGarr,