| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6923138 | Computers & Geosciences | 2012 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
⺠This article compares three drainage-constrained methods for DEM generalization. ⺠We compared the accuracy of the elevations (i.e. RMSE) using the three methods. ⺠We compared the mean slope and surface roughness using the three methods. ⺠We compared the streamline matching rate and error using the three methods. ⺠Results show the Compound constrained-TIN algorithm offers the best performance.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Computer Science Applications
Authors
Yumin Chen, John P. Wilson, Quansheng Zhu, Qiming Zhou,