Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6962529 | Environmental Modelling & Software | 2016 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Non-native honeybees historically have been managed for crop pollination, however, recent population declines draw attention to pollination services provided by native bees. We applied the InVEST Crop Pollination model, developed to predict native bee abundance from habitat resources, in Maine's wild blueberry crop landscape. We evaluated model performance with parameters informed by four approaches: 1) expert opinion; 2) sensitivity analysis; 3) sensitivity analysis informed model optimization; and, 4) simulated annealing (uninformed) model optimization. Uninformed optimization improved model performance by 29% compared to expert opinion-informed model, while sensitivity-analysis informed optimization improved model performance by 54%. This suggests that expert opinion may not result in the best parameter values for the InVEST model. The proportion of deciduous/mixed forest within 2000Â m of a blueberry field also reliably predicted native bee abundance in blueberry fields, however, the InVEST model provides an efficient tool to estimate bee abundance beyond the field perimeter.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Software
Authors
Shannon C. Groff, Cynthia S. Loftin, Frank Drummond, Sara Bushmann, Brian McGill,