| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 700462 | Control Engineering Practice | 2006 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
A comparison between receding horizon control (RHC) approaches is presented for the longitudinal axis control of an F-16 aircraft. The results suggest that the flexibility provided by a scheduled RHC scheme based on flight condition-dependent linear prediction models is a necessary requirement for achieving good performance as opposed to a single LTI model-based method. The scheduled scheme offers an attractive alternative to a full nonlinear model-based RHC approach by trading off an acceptable degradation in performance to modest computational complexity and real-time implementability.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Authors
Tamás Keviczky, Gary J. Balas,