Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
7049022 Applied Thermal Engineering 2015 37 Pages PDF
Abstract
Two configurations (points to be controlled close to or far from actuators and perturbations) are studied. A parametric analysis is carried out and shows the main differences between both control techniques. For MPC, the lower the penalization coefficient is, the better the results are, provided that the number of time steps for prediction horizon is sufficiently large. On the contrary, for LQG, it has been observed that decreasing the cost parameter down to its critical value for which the LQR Riccati equation cannot be solved anymore, leads to the control failure.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Authors
, , , , , ,