Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7049022 | Applied Thermal Engineering | 2015 | 37 Pages |
Abstract
Two configurations (points to be controlled close to or far from actuators and perturbations) are studied. A parametric analysis is carried out and shows the main differences between both control techniques. For MPC, the lower the penalization coefficient is, the better the results are, provided that the number of time steps for prediction horizon is sufficiently large. On the contrary, for LQG, it has been observed that decreasing the cost parameter down to its critical value for which the LQR Riccati equation cannot be solved anymore, leads to the control failure.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Authors
Etienne Videcoq, Manuel Girault, Kamélia Bouderbala, Hichem Nouira, José Salgado, Daniel Petit,