Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
71944 Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2016 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

•A simple drying method yielded high surface area in pulp samples, up to 280 m2/g.•The dry state porosities correlated well to the wet state values.•Kraft had more specific surface area but more closed surface than dissolving pulp.•Drying caused mesopore loss but occasionally large cracks were formed.•The fibrils and pores formed aggregates and chain-like formations, respectively.

The porosity of kraft and dissolving pulp samples with different drying histories were studied in the wet (Water Retention Value, Solute Exclusion) and dry state (N2 sorption, Scanning Electron Microscopy) and the results were compared. An efficient drying protocol was created to minimize porosity loss upon water removal for dry analyses. The samples were first solvent exchanged by dialysis to dry acetone and then critical point dried (CPD) from CO2.It was found out that even after reaching relatively high specific surface areas of 200–300 m2/g for CPD pulp, the samples had shrunk and most of the micropores were not detectable until rewetting. However, the dry state mesoporosity correlated well with the wet state values. SEM was used to examine the pore structure and fibril arrangement of the CPD fiber sample. The kraft pulps were found to have a larger specific pore volume and surface area than the dissolving pulps as measured by N2 sorption. However, SEM analysis of the samples showed the dissolving pulps had a more homogenous and more open surface porosity than the kraft samples. The kraft pulp showed less hornification after drying and rewetting than the dissolving pulp. Heating of kraft pulp to 100 °C during drying increased the irreversible pore closure. Pores were often arranged in chain-like formations and signs of surface fibril aggregation were detected.

Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Catalysis
Authors
, , , , ,