Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7244992 | Journal of Economic Psychology | 2013 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
The utility of gambling model posits that consumption benefits lead rational agents to gamble when faced with negative expected financial returns. We analyze the determinants of bet volume and dollars bet on NCAA basketball games from three on-line sports books to test the predictions of this model. Betting action depends on television coverage, team quality, and the expected closeness of the contest. Our results support the notion that consumption benefits, not financial gain, motivate gambling. Preferences of bettors appear similar to those of sports fans, suggesting that models of gamblers as wealth-maximizing investors may not explain observed betting behavior.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Marketing
Authors
Brad R. Humphreys, Rodney J. Paul, Andrew P. Weinbach,