Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7247167 | Journal of Vocational Behavior | 2018 | 39 Pages |
Abstract
Although student integration theory, a sociologically-based model, has been the dominant explanation for student drop-out from colleges for over 40â¯years, it has received only mixed empirical support in residential colleges and less in non-residential colleges. Psychological theories of active choice and behavior change offer an alternative explanation for drop-out. In research at a non-residential UK university, structural equation modeling was used in two separate studies to compare a model of student dropout based on student integration theory with a psychological model based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB). In the ï¬rst study (Nâ¯=â¯633), a model including TPB variables and two key student integration theory variables (academic integration, and social integration) showed good ï¬t to the data, Although all three TPB variables predicted intention to quit, neither of the two student integration theory variables did so. The TPB variables explained over 60% of the variance in student's intention to voluntarily withdraw from college before completing their studies, and intention to withdraw was associated with actual dropout behavior. In the second study (Nâ¯=â¯180), using alternative measures of student integration theory factors, a model including both student integration theory and TPB variables had acceptable ï¬t, and over 70% of the variance in intention to quit was explained. But only the TPB variables predicted intention to quit signiï¬cantly. The beneï¬ts of adopting a process-based psychological explanation to student retention are discussed.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Marketing
Authors
Chris Dewberry, Duncan J.R. Jackson,