| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7356023 | Journal of Accounting and Economics | 2018 | 52 Pages | 
Abstract
												Acquirers are motivated to overstate earnings prior to stock-financed acquisitions. We hypothesize that audits help to detect and correct such overstatements. We test this using a difference-in-differences design, which compares audit adjustments to earnings for stock-financed and cash-financed acquirers before versus after the acquisitions. Consistent with our hypothesis, we find larger downward adjustments in the audits immediately before stock-financed acquisitions. Further analysis of regulatory sanctions suggests the downward adjustments are in fact warranted, rather than auditors being overly conservative. Moreover, modifications in audit reports suggest that downward adjustments do not correct all of the reporting irregularities in audited financial statements.
											Keywords
												
											Related Topics
												
													Social Sciences and Humanities
													Business, Management and Accounting
													Accounting
												
											Authors
												Clive Lennox, Zi-Tian Wang, Xi Wu, 
											