Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7357033 | Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics | 2017 | 48 Pages |
Abstract
We examine whether corporate pension plans of client firms (hereafter, clients) influence auditors' decisions on audit pricing for the clients in the U.S. We find that, on average, auditors charge higher fees for auditing financial statements of client firms sponsoring defined benefits (DB) pension plans than matched firms without DB pension plans. Moreover, we find that the effect of DB pension plans on audit fees is stronger when clients' earnings are more sensitive to DB pension estimates, or when managers' compensation induces more risk taking. Finally, we find that the additional audit fees charged for clients with DB pension plans are negatively associated with the extent of manipulations of DB pension accounting estimates. Collectively, our findings suggest that auditors consider managers' incentive to manipulate earnings and increase audit effort to reduce audit risk associated with DB pension accounting, which results in higher audit fees.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Business, Management and Accounting (General)
Authors
Yangyang Chen, Rui Ge, Leon Zolotoy,