Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7408531 | International Journal of Forecasting | 2014 | 15 Pages |
Abstract
Experts were used as Delphi panellists and asked to present forecasts on financial market variables in a controlled experiment. We found that the respondents with the least accurate or least conventional views were particularly likely to modify their answers. Most of these modifications were in the right direction but too small, probably because of belief-perseverance bias. This paper also presents two post-survey adjustment methods for Delphi method based forecasts. First, we present a potential method to correct for the belief perseverance bias. The results seem promising. Secondly, we test a conditional forecasting process, which unexpectedly proves unsuccessful.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Business and International Management
Authors
Karlo Kauko, Peter Palmroos,