| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7408591 | International Journal of Forecasting | 2013 | 7 Pages | 
Abstract
												We draw attention to a simple yet underappreciated way of forecasting the outcomes of elections involving two rounds of voting: surveying the voters' candidate evaluations in first round exit polls, poststratifying the sample proportions of reported votes to official first round election returns, and redistributing the votes for eliminated competitors according to their supporters' lower-order preferences among the viable alternatives in round two. We argue that the approach is likely to outperform standard pre-election surveys, due to its better coverage and reduced measurement error, and the possibility of correcting for sample selection. We set out the practical details of the method and demonstrate its usefulness by employing a recent German mayoral election as an empirical case. Thirteen candidates were competing in the first round, while there were six candidates in the decisive second round. The runoff result was forecast two weeks in advance with an average absolute error of less than one percentage point.
											Keywords
												
											Related Topics
												
													Social Sciences and Humanities
													Business, Management and Accounting
													Business and International Management
												
											Authors
												Peter Selb, Michael Herrmann, Simon Munzert, Thomas Schübel, Susumu Shikano, 
											