Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7432417 | Industrial Marketing Management | 2016 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
How do the three dimensions of geographic export diversification-namely, (1) export intensity, (2) export scope, and (3) export destinations-interact in determining firm performance? How does the export intensity-performance relationship change considering export scope and destinations? Drawing on institution-based and resource-based lenses, we argue that differences between home and destination country institutional environments are amplified by the scope or variety of export destinations. As firm resources nurtured in the home country may not fit an increasing number of different foreign institutional environments, the export intensity-firm performance relationship turns negative. Conversely, our panel data analysis suggests a positive relationship between export intensity and performance when exporters from an emerging economy increase their exports to a limited number of other emerging economies. Thus, our findings extend conventional wisdom on the export intensity-firm performance relationship and suggest that the international marketing strategy literature needs to simultaneously incorporate three dimensions (including export destinations) into the geographic export diversification construct.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Marketing
Authors
Dirk Michael Boehe, Gongming Qian, Mike W. Peng,