Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7518440 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2018 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy are based on studies with a majority of “high” or “unclear” bias assessments. The age of the articles explained only a small part of the variability of the score assessments, therefore not justifying an a priori exclusion of older articles in systematic reviews. There is an urgent need to improve the quality of design, conduct, and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Nicola Di Girolamo, Alexandra Winter, Reint Meursinge Reynders,