| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7519051 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2018 | 18 Pages |
Abstract
Few studies in the systematic review received high scores using the CONSORT Harms criteria. Most studies reported on the most important criteria regarding risk of gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation. Reviewer agreement showed large variations due to imprecise texts and ambiguous criteria. Routine scoring according to fulfillment of the CONSORT Harms recommendations would be inadvisable without qualified judgment.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Tone Westergren, Sigrid Narum, Marianne Klemp,