Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7519153 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2018 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
There is increasing recognition of the importance of the distinction between efficacy and effectiveness research in the design, conduct, and evaluation of interventions and program outcomes. There is a concurrent increase in the application of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. These two lines of inquiry are only beginning to meet. There is an emerging need for systematic reviews and meta-analyses to account for differences in degrees to which included studies reflect either efficacy or effectiveness design. Based on ongoing work on a formal systematic review of the hepatitis C virus care continuum, this paper describes and discusses the rationale for, and how the PRECIS-II instrument can be used on, and modestly adapted to, studies included in the systematic review examining the extent to which studies include elements of efficacy or effectiveness or a combination of the two. We also highlight that use of such an instrument may have general applicability to and value in the conduct of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Ashly E. Jordan, David C. Perlman, Daniel J. Smith, Jennifer R. Reed, Holly Hagan,