| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7519223 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2017 | 48 Pages |
Abstract
Applying the five quality indicators is feasible. The quality of evidence in reviews of primary prevention can be substantially improved. Trialists and review authors should provide more information especially on adherence, costs, and indirectness of the outcome. Methodological research is needed on how to incorporate cost information in systematic reviews and how to better deal with indirectness.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Sara Allaouat, Zahra Roustaei, Jos Verbeek, Jani Ruotsalainen,