Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7519378 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2017 | 18 Pages |
Abstract
This article identifies and describes elements of frameworks and how they can be adapted to inform the protocol and conduct of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Modifications may be needed to adapt the population, intervention, comparators, and outcomes normally used in protocol development to successfully describe complex interventions; in some instances, alternative frameworks may be better suited. Possible approaches to analytic frameworks for complex interventions that illustrate causal and associative linkages are outlined, including time elements, which systematic reviews of complex interventions may need to address. The need for and specifics of the accommodations vary with details of a specific systematic review. This in turn helps determine whether traditional frameworks are sufficient, can be refined, or if alternate frameworks must be adopted.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Mary Butler, Richard A. Epstein, Annette Totten, Evelyn P. Whitlock, Mohammed T. Ansari, Laura J. Damschroder, Ethan Balk, Eric B. Bass, Nancy D. Berkman, Susanne Hempel, Suchitra Iyer, Karen Schoelles, Jeanne-Marie Guise,