Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7519384 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2017 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Systematic reviews of complex interventions comprising multiple questions may use multiple analytic approaches. Parameters to consider when choosing analytic methods for complex interventions include nature and timing of the decision (clinical practice guideline, policy, or other); purpose of the review; extent of existing evidence; logistic factors such as the timeline, process, and resources for deciding the scope of the review; and value of information to be obtained from choosing specific systematic review methods. Reviewers may elect to revise their analytic approach based on new or changing considerations during the course of the review but should guard against bias through transparency of reporting.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Meera Viswanathan, Melissa L. McPheeters, M. Hassan Murad, Mary E. Butler, Emily E. (Beth) Devine, Michele P. Dyson, Jeanne-Marie Guise, Leila C. Kahwati, Jeremy N.V. Miles, Sally C. Morton,